On the eve of the ball, a coach arrives carrying Lydia, Elizabeth’s disgraced sister, who stumbles out of the carriage shrieking that Wickham has been murdered. Darcy sends a search party into nearby woodland to search for murderer and victim and find Wickham, drunk and incoherent, crouched over the body of his friend, Martyn Denny. I hoped it was Wickham so the Bennetts, Darcys and Bingleys could have got rid of him for good, but no such luck.
P D James is regarded as one of our best novelists, and I have always enjoyed her mysteries and looked forward to a murder mystery at Pemberley, but I was really disappointed, though I stuck it out to the end to see if there would be a surprise - there wasn't.
There is no emotional conflict in this plot – whether Wickham was innocent or guilty was of no interest to either the reader or the characters, all they wanted was to avoid further scandal, and who could blame them after his behaviour towards the entire Bennett clan in Pride and Prejudice – why would Ms James imagine anyone would care what happens to him in this novel?
Lydia makes a brief appearance as an hysterical wife, who, on arriving at Elizabeth’s house promptly yells, ‘Not you, not you,’ when offered assistance, then proceeds to sleep in her house, eat her food and accept the care of the saintly Jane. I would have packed the madam off to an inn straight away. To add insult to injury, Lydia confesses that although not invited to the Lady Anne ball, she turned up intending to attend anyway, working presumably on the axiom, ‘When you go home, they have to let you in.’
There is no actual detective work, not even amateur efforts, and the crime is investigated by local magistrates. By coincidence, Darcy is one so his first job is to recuse himself because of his known past with Wickham and because the crime happened on his property. Of course forensics don’t exist either, a magistrate asks a doctor called in to advise on the case, “that your clever scientific colleagues have not yet found a way of distinguishing one man’s blood from another?”
The mystery is revealed at an inquest, a subsequent trial at the Old Bailey where no witness has been left out or minutiae of courtroom procedure overlooked, and then is finally revealed in the culprit’s deathbed confession, Colonel Fitzwilliam who is a witness to the whole sorry situation and then Wickham puts us through an almost identical and laconic account of the same story - which condemns him as a complete cad in any case. No informative clues are dribbled into the narrative for the reader to work out, so when the truth comes out it is completely new – well most of it.
Darcy the most romantic hero of all time, and Elizabeth, a delightful, assertive woman with a sharp wit, and don’t forget the ‘fine eyes’, ‘longed for’ each other when they were apart, but displayed little affection the rest of the time. Elizabeth is colourless, and complacent with none of the intelligence we know she possesses. Lydia is still a brat, but she disappeared entirely after her bout of hysteria and Jane slid under the skirting board somewhere along the line never to be seen again. Mary Bennett has married a puritan clergyman but doesn't make an appearance, nor does the happily single Kitty Bennett who likes running things at Longbourn.
Ms James has made Darcy’s late great-grandfather into an eccentric who found the pressure of being lord of the manor untenable and went to live alone in the woods with his dog. What a shame this story wasn’t about him, he sounds quite a character.
Wickham remains true to character, arrogant and self-serving with scant gratitude for what is done for him, and Lydia remains a simpering idiot in awe of a man she evidently deserves.
Curious as to what more eminent reviewers thought of this, I looked a few up and The Guardian one opens with:
It is a truth not universally acknowledged that a classic novel is not in want of a sequel.
I tend to agree, and I'm sorry Ms James, I normally love your work, but I’m afraid I won’t even be keeping this one on my e-reader.